Introduction
Aaron Gunn emerged from the world of online political commentary to become one of Canada’s most polarizing Conservative voices. Elected in 2025 as Member of Parliament for North Island—Powell River, Gunn leveraged a high-profile digital platform and a record of fiery populist rhetoric. With a background in documentary filmmaking and advocacy for fiscal conservatism, his rise to political prominence has been shaped as much by controversy as by strategy. Best known for his viral film Vancouver is Dying and his combative takes on Indigenous reconciliation, drug policy, and gender issues, Gunn’s entry into federal politics signaled a cultural flashpoint within Canada’s evolving conservative movement. While embraced by parts of the Conservative base, he has faced sharp criticism from Indigenous leaders, progressive groups, and political opponents. Yet, despite the firestorm, Gunn now represents a federal riding—signaling a new phase in his ambitions and influence.
Early Life and Media Career
Born in 1989 or 1990 and raised in Greater Victoria, Aaron Gunn’s early interest in film and storytelling merged with an inclination toward political activism. He earned a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Victoria and served in the Canadian Army Reserve with the 5th (British Columbia) Field Artillery Regiment, grounding his identity in service and nationalism.
After university, Gunn joined the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, where he developed a sharp-edged communication style rooted in fiscal conservatism. He went on to work with Canada Proud, producing hundreds of short-form political videos aimed at promoting right-leaning narratives. By 2018, Gunn launched his own YouTube channel, which rapidly gained traction through controversial content that questioned prevailing policies on taxation, governance, and social issues.
His 2022 documentary Vancouver is Dying—a critique of progressive drug and homelessness policy—catapulted him into the national spotlight. Though the film garnered millions of views and support from law-and-order advocates, it was widely criticized by health experts and advocates for misrepresenting addiction and reinforcing stigmas. Nevertheless, it confirmed Gunn’s status as a disruptive political communicator, willing to court backlash to reach his audience.
Political Rise and Party Challenges
In 2021, Gunn announced a run for leadership of the BC Liberal Party, but was disqualified the following year by the party’s vetting committee due to his statements on reconciliation and social policy. His exclusion ignited debates about the boundaries of acceptable political discourse, especially within centrist parties.
Following this rejection, Gunn co-founded Common Sense BC, a grassroots advocacy group aimed at pushing the BC Conservative Party toward more hardline, right-populist positions. The group successfully helped elect a new board for the BC Conservatives in 2022, bringing in figures like Angelo Isidorou and launching a refreshed platform and digital strategy.
In 2023, Gunn secured the Conservative Party of Canada nomination for North Island—Powell River. Despite ongoing controversy over past remarks about residential schools—including denying genocide and claiming some Indigenous groups “asked for” the institutions—party leader Pierre Poilievre stood by him during the campaign. Gunn’s candidacy drew condemnation from Indigenous leaders and prompted protests, but his campaign stayed focused on anti-crime messaging, resource development, and opposition to environmental regulation.
Gunn won the seat in 2025 with 38.8% of the vote, flipping it from the NDP amid a fractured center-left vote. His win highlighted how a polarizing figure could still find electoral success in a region frustrated with economic stagnation and federal regulation.
Political Positions and Public Image (200–300 words)
Gunn identifies as a “small-c” conservative with firm views on national identity, resource development, and social policy. He opposes diversity hiring in the Canadian Armed Forces, arguing it discriminates against white men. On gender issues, he asserts there are only two genders and claims the gender pay gap is a myth.
Gunn is anti-abortion, earning a “green light” from Campaign Life Coalition, and firmly opposes decriminalization and safe supply approaches to drug addiction. He instead calls for investments in treatment and recovery programs. His views have placed him at odds with many in the medical and policy communities.
In foreign affairs, Gunn faced backlash when resurfaced 2014 posts revealed sympathetic comments toward Vladimir Putin’s policies. He later apologized, calling his earlier remarks “foolish.”
Public perception of Gunn is sharply divided: to supporters, he is a truth-teller challenging political correctness; to critics, he is a provocateur exploiting cultural division. Either way, his presence in Parliament marks a shift toward a more combative conservatism in Canada.
Current Role and Outlook
As of 2025, Gunn serves as a backbench MP in the Conservative caucus but commands outsized attention due to his media savvy and digital reach. While he holds no cabinet position, he continues to influence debate on drug policy, free speech, and Indigenous affairs—often through social media and video commentary.
Gunn has publicly opposed the Great Bear Sea Marine Protected Area, criticizing it as an elitist and environmentally radical agenda. His advocacy for commercial fishing and opposition to federal conservation measures appeals to regional voters concerned about economic access.
While his future in Parliament remains uncertain—particularly if controversy intensifies—Gunn represents a new template for politically active influencers moving into formal governance. His trajectory suggests that Canada’s populist right is increasingly digital, media-driven, and unafraid of confrontation.
Conclusion
Aaron Gunn’s transition from filmmaker to federal politician exemplifies the fusion of media influence and political ambition. While his rise has been marked by controversy, it also signals the expanding role of alternative media in shaping public discourse and electoral outcomes.
A figure who inspires both admiration and outrage, Gunn’s presence in Parliament forces broader conversations on free speech, reconciliation, and the future direction of conservatism in Canada. Whether he evolves into a more conventional politician or remains an icon of right-wing populism, Gunn’s story reflects the deep ideological shifts taking place across the political spectrum. In an era defined by polarization, he is both a product and a driver of the moment.
